Webflow's recent announcement to make GSAP 100% free has sparked a nuanced conversation among online commentators about the future of web animation tools. The move isn't simply about making a popular library accessible—it's a calculated strategy that comes with notable constraints.

At the heart of the discussion is the library's new licensing model. While GSAP is now free, it comes with express prohibitions on competing with Webflow, a detail that hasn't gone unnoticed by tech-savvy developers. Some online commentators view this as a clever "land grab" that could potentially limit the library's broader ecosystem adoption.

The animation landscape is already rich with alternatives like Motion.dev, AnimeJS, and Lottie, each catering to different animation needs. GSAP, originally a Flash-era tool, has evolved significantly, maintaining a reputation for robust, professional-grade animations. However, the new licensing model might push developers to explore these competing platforms.

Veteran developers remember GSAP's roots in Flash animation, with some nostalgically recalling its ubiquity in sub-5kb banner projects. The library's journey from a niche tool to a web animation standard is now potentially being reshaped by Webflow's strategic positioning.

Ultimately, the community seems split. Some appreciate the newfound accessibility, while others are skeptical of the attached strings. The broader narrative speaks to ongoing tensions in open-source development: how do companies balance product strategy with community goodwill?